Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Lamont Pride: The Jokers Conundrum

     A career criminal is once again out of jail for all the wrong reasons including loopholes in the system and misguided compassion. He races through the night from dark alley's and buildings to the next after violently ending innocent lives and forever psychologically scarring the lives of the victims loved ones and friends. He is chased by an avenging angel...a dark knight...a battle ensues...it's vicious and bloody...the final blow sends the criminal over the edge of the building...to his well deserved death...but the hero catches his foot just as he goes over and with incredible effort and risk to his own life saves the killer. He turns him over to the authorities to arrest, try, and if found guilty with the proper evidence incarcerated. Release into society and repeat over and over again sacrificing innocents in the process.

    While the above reads as a comic book you've read or seen in the movies or on TV...the real problem and sad truth is that without the elaborate costumes, gadgets, and make-up this happens on our streets every day. Peter Figoski was a Blue Knight who was shot down in cold blood by a career criminal who should not have been on the streets in the first place. Lamont Pride...a fitting last name for a career criminal with an 11 page rap sheet..."pride" being not only one of the deadly sins but considered to be the original. Why was he out on the streets in the first place? I'm not just referencing the judge's decision to release him...why was he out in the first place? How many crimes does one have to commit until it becomes clear that he/she simply cannot live within our society without harming others? We are one country and while I'm no Lawyer so I don not know the details...if one shoots someone in one state is another to do nothing about it? Can another state not hold or extradite one to another state?!?

    I understand that the laws are in place are to protect us from becoming a Totalitarian state. Our laws came about because Royalty in Western Europe believed they were above the common man. As common men our ancestors throw off their yoke and put an end to that. So while I agree with innocent until proven guilty (though I question if it should be by peers or professionals) just how many times do you have to be proven guilty or commit an act so heinous that you are removed from society for good? Take Jerome Issac for instance. He's not a career criminal..he has no priors or 11 page rap sheet. Why do I mention him? Jerome felt an elderly woman owed him money for work he did around her apartment. She stopped using his services because things in her apartment were going missing on a regular basis whenever he did work. Jerome solution's to work this out...he approached the 67 year old woman in an elevator...sprayed her with flammable liquid then threw a Molotov cocktail at her lighting her on fire...she burned to death screaming. The list of horrors that have been committed just over this last year from the shooting of Senator Gifford and those killed around her to the massacre at the Long Island Pharmacy...the list is sadly endless.

    Now some of you may point out that neither of these men have been found guilty in a court of law...yet. You would be correct at this point in time. Lamont Pride for the record to the best of my knowledge admits he did shoot Officer Figoski...but by accident and that it was not his gun. Jerome Issac turned himself him. Half of his face is baldy burned...in a dark twisted take on life imitating art he looks like a real life version of Two-Face. What is our society to do what men like these(I will not put in writing what I what do...but it would less then pleasant for you to read). The Laws need to protect the innocent as well as the accused. If one is incapable of not stealing, raping, assaulting, killing etc then one should not be allowed to live among us. If one commits an act so vicious and horrible...I'm sorry but I have no desire to give them a second chance or try to rehabilitate them. Some of you might. You may be more compassionate then I. I've heard more then enough pseudo hypothetical pseudo-intellectual arguments on the subject. Just tell me...if your Mother was burned alive by a madman or your Daddy was shot in the face and killed by a career criminal who should have been in jail and not on the streets in the first place do your arguments still hold up for you?

Please note...if you are so inclined you can make a donation to a fund for Officer Figoski's surviving 4 daughters at Peter Figoski Scholarship Fund Please make sure you note that it is for this fund....as there are many.